UN Establishes Post of LGBT Enforcer

UN Establishes Post of LGBT Enforcer

International institutions exist to impose their radical vision on the whole world.
Just a few days ago in Geneva disaster struck. Click here 

C-Fam Centre For family and human rights logo

Radical delegations from Europe have established the position of UN-LGBT Enforcer.

This UN-LGBT Enforcer will travel the world imposing the sexual revolution on peoples and churches and countries who do not want it.

It will be under the guise of protecting LGBT people from discrimination. But that is a lie.

The purpose will be aimed at anyone who believes in traditional sexual morality and to stamp out that belief.

The New United Nations LGBT Enforcer will determine, without a doubt, that your religious beliefs are nothing more than hate.

The new UN-LGBT Enforcer will come with the might and muscle of the United Nations, the European Union, and the United States and with the power to enforce this radical new belief.

C-Fam and other pro-family NGOs worked tirelessly to block this new position. Alas, under threat of losing international aid and other unethical threats, the new position was instituted by the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.

C-Fam and our allies around the world will be on the watch for the inevitable abuses that will come from this individual and the powerful forces behind him.

We cannot do this alone; we cannot do this without your prayers; we cannot do this without your financial support.

We are up against the most powerful people and institutions on the earth. They have unlimited funds and the power of governments behind them.

We pledge never to give up in defending religious people against the new sexual ideology. But we cannot do it without your help.

Austin Ruse
President – C-Fam


Will the hierarchy please end their deafening – if not cowardly – silence on the relentless spread of LGBT influence?  

With a Pope who is falling over himself to appease and apologise to them all over the place, it can’t be easy, I agree, but it is the duty of everyone in the Church, ordained and lay, to expose and fight public sin. Nobody can claim to be working for Social Justice, that is, the reign of Christ the King, Who must be at the head of every nation under Heaven, while tolerating and even accepting, as a good in its own right, the diabolical spread of homosexuality. And now we have this acceptance moving to enforcement.  

Do we have anything to fear from the creation of this LGBT Enforcer post? Will we find ourselves being criminalised simply for openly discussing our concerns – e.g. in the blogosphere?  Or do I exaggerate?  Over to you… 

Comments (21)

  • Fidelis

    How is this Enforcer going to operate? Will they be going to schools and other institutions to check on policies, etc or will be actually be interviewing or monitoring adults and children to find our their opinions and beliefs and then take action if these opinions and beliefs do not conform to LGBT “standards”?

    Do I think it is sinister? I very definitely do.

    July 6, 2016 at 8:15 pm
    • westminsterfly


      There are plenty of people out there, only too willing to report any perceived breaches of the LGBT agenda to a so-called enforcer. Look at the recent case of the Christian dating website ChristianMingle. They were matching members of the opposite sex for dates, and two men complained that this was discriminatory:- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3672840/Owner-dating-site-ChristianMingle-agrees-open-doors-gay-singles-judge-approved-settlement-following-class-action-anti-discrimination-lawsuit.html They won the case.

      July 7, 2016 at 4:04 pm
      • editor

        Some of us should launch a class action for admission of the public to the Westminster (House of Commons) bars – after all, they don’t come more common than us lot, Westminster Fly, do they? 😀

        Seriously, that is yet more evidence of the stranglehold which the LGBT “community” has on society today, both in the USA and here in the UK. I noticed that when offering three bullet points yesterday on the news, reporting on the two finalists in the competition for leader of the Conservative Party/Prime Minister, the third bullet point was how the candidates voted for same-sex marriage (Theresa May voted for, and Andrea Leadsom abstained). Attitudes to the LGBT “movement” is now, clearly, the litmus test of orthodoxy and acceptability.

        I remember a time when Theresa May was NOT in favour of the LGBT agenda, when she – looking very uncomfortable – faced an angry Question Time audience, trying to explain her position, that there are people who, for legitimate reasons, do not approve. She later did a complete u-turn – which is evidence, it seems to me, that she is a really dishonest politician. Oops! Now, there’s a novelty!

        July 8, 2016 at 9:24 am
      • westminsterfly

        I think it might be very dangerous to put me in a bar full of politicians with a few drinks inside me. A few home truths might be spoken! 😆 Yes, you can see the pressure for them to conform to the new ‘orthodoxy’, but as can be found in Isaiah 5:20 “Woe to those that call evil good, and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.” The sad thing is, I don’t even think they believe what they say. They just feel they have to say it, in order to keep their job.

        July 8, 2016 at 12:58 pm
  • Lily

    I agree. This is a really worrying development, and I know that the LGBT people are already all over the schools, including Catholic schools. How the bishops of Scotland can sleep at night, is beyond me.

    July 6, 2016 at 8:24 pm
  • Bernadette Milliken

    Only Our Lady can solve this.

    Sent from my iPad

    July 6, 2016 at 9:31 pm
  • Pat McKay

    I wonder who’s next for a ‘papal apology’. Abortionists, perhaps – or maybe IVF practitioners….?

    July 7, 2016 at 11:45 am
  • RCA Victor

    Here’s a more detailed article about this from The New American website: http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/23579-un-unleashes-lgbt-czar-to-promote-homosexuality-transgenderism

    July 7, 2016 at 4:21 pm
    • Margaret Mary

      That’s really shocking news. I just can’t believe it. How will it work in practise?

      July 7, 2016 at 10:52 pm
      • Theresa Rose

        Margaret Mary,

        I cannot see how it will work in practise. But I would not be surprised to see the criminalization of those who stand against the LGBT agenda.

        July 8, 2016 at 8:44 am
      • editor

        Theresa Rose,

        I can’t see how it will work in practise either, but it will be put to the test, of that we can be sure. Already, as you know, we’ve had people taken to court for refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex “wedding” and who can forget the Christian B & B couple whose business was destroyed when they were legally challenged for refusing a double room to a same-sex couple.

        It’s a sinister development, no question about it. I suspect that anyone who, for whatever reasons, comes to the attention of the authorities, will find their views on LGBT “rights” investigated. People interviewed for jobs, people in management positions, people in trouble of whatever kind with the police etc. It will become routine to be asked our views and beliefs on homosexuality. That’s my best guess about the “how” of enforcement.

        July 8, 2016 at 9:31 am
  • sixupman

    We are faced with a pincer movement – Modernist Catholic/Christian LBGT on one side and Islam, et al, on the other, with ourselves the ‘meat in the sandwich’. But what then after our elimination? Are the former likely and able to withstand the forces of Islam – the former are sowing the seeds of their own destruction.

    We inly have ourselves to blame and must prepare for physical and legal persecution.Currently there are those who call for a strand against Franciscus. It is too late, the stand should have been made upon the changes and ultimate introduction of the NOM. Obedience and a ‘quiet life dictated otherwise, clergy who did stand-up, the likes of Fr. Oswald Baker (RIP), were kicked out or re-educated [what a communist term].

    July 8, 2016 at 9:36 am
    • editor


      Well said. It is really infuriating, in a way*, to see the Johnny-come-lately brigade seeking the head of Papa Francis when, if they had only paid attention to the attacks on the Faith from the get-go (Vatican II) we wouldn’t HAVE a Papa Francis. Many of those now claiming concern over this pontificate, were buying tickets to attend the “canonisations” of two of the main architects of the current mess, not so long ago.

      Laugh? I thought I’d never start…

      * I say “in a way” because, when all is said and done, we have to welcome them aboard, better late than never.

      July 8, 2016 at 11:49 pm
  • Pat McKay

    A few years ago (2012-ish), Christian Order published this quotation from David Skinner of Christian Concern…

    ……’The daylight appears to be drawing in when we will no longer be able to write or say anything that does nothing less than celebrate homosexuality. Perhaps we have only a matter of a few years or even months before the LGBT juggernaut silences us completely. Stonewall would now seemingly exert almost total control of the judiciary, legislature and political machinery of our once-free nation. Let us not forget how Stonewall and the Equality and Human Rights Commission attempted to destroy Mr and Mrs Bull and their B&B business, Chymorvah, in Cornwall, because they refused to allow two men to have sex under their roof, in their beds.

    Here we are being denied access to a major event in the heart of London because we affirm the traditional view of marriage. (unquote – Mr Skinner was referring here to the Law Society having revoked the booking of their premises for a major marriage conference hosted by Christian Concern and the World Congress of Families, titled…..”One Man One Woman – Making the case for marriage, for the good of society”….The Law Society claimed that the event was ‘contrary to its diversity policy’).

    And just last month, our [Christian] advert, on 26 London buses, was banned by Boris Johnson, mayor of London , who abused his position to silence our voice. In my view, this is merely a rehearsal for a fast-approaching totalitarian state’….

    July 8, 2016 at 9:42 am
    • editor


      I think it is no exaggeration to say that we are now definitely fast approaching that totalitarian state.

      July 8, 2016 at 11:53 pm
  • Helen

    I read on a link on the BBC website that one of the contestants for the Tory leadership, Andrea Leadsom, has “weird” views on certain matters. It cites that she is anti gay marriage, pro family etc!!!

    I often wonder how it has come to this in such a short time. Soon we won’t be able to speak our minds in public!

    July 8, 2016 at 10:23 am
    • Petrus

      I saw Andrea Leadsome being asked about this on the ITV news. Her response was what was weird. She has no problem with same sex marriage but she didn’t like the legislation. She believes marriage should be between a man and a woman but she thinks civil partnerships are a marriage too! Can someone please decipher that for me?

      July 8, 2016 at 12:32 pm
  • Margaret Mary

    I couldn’t believe this when I read it just now:

    OTTAWA, July 7, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) is defending the decision of a local Ottawa branch to paint its ATMs located in the front entrance in rainbow colours in support of homosexuality.

    Ottawa resident Donald Bruneau said he was shocked when he saw the rainbow painted ATMs while making a recent trip to the branch located at 84 Bank Street in Ottawa.

    “When I asked the teller the meaning behind the rainbow colors, she replied, ‘Equality.’ When I asked her if they would be willing to paint an image of the Christian cross that I wear around my neck on an ATM to celebrate Christian equality, she did not answer,” he told LifeSiteNews.

    Bruneau said that CIBC’s decision to push the “gay agenda” on its ATMs has made him decide to switch to a different bank.

    “When I use a bank, I simply want to perform financial transactions and not be confronted in my face with propaganda from the homosexual movement,” he said.

    The Bank; Queen banking centre at 84 Bank St., Ottawa, where the rainbow ATMs are located.

    LifeSiteNews reached out to branch manager Robert Jenkins for comment, but Jenkins did not return messages left on his voicemail as well as an email.

    LifeSiteNews then reached out to CIBC’s corporate head office located in Toronto. Olga Petrycki, CIBC’s Director of Public Relations, responded that CIBC is “proud” to support the LGBT movement.

    “CIBC is proud to be an inclusive organization that supports the diversity of Canada and our communities,” she said in an email response.

    On its website, CIBC states that it was one of the first corporations in Canada to “dedicate an entire month to the celebration of diversity” through “diversity education” of its about 40,000 employees. It also has its own employee-led “Pride Network” to support “gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans-identified employees.”

    Last May at the Rome Life Forum LifeSiteNews editor-in-chief John Henry Westen spoke about what he believes is the forthcoming “imposition” of the homosexual ideology on individuals through pressures exerted by huge corporations, such as banks, who have signed onto promoting the ‘diversity and equality’ agenda.

    “We have seen the financial coercion go from the international level to the national. As I mentioned earlier we have also begun to see it affect certain individuals. I would suggest it will not be too long before that pressure is applied to each individual,” he said.

    The list of other banks which have gone out of their way to show their support for homosexuality includes, but is not limited to, Toronto-Dominion Bank, the Royal Bank of Canada, as well as the Bank of Montreal.

    Westen fears the time is coming when individuals who refuse to embrace the homosexual agenda will have their financial freedoms stripped away as a penalty for not being an “upstanding citizen.”

    Bruneau said that Christians need to start seeing the signs of the times with regard to the advancement of homosexuality.

    “We Christians need to wake up, or we are going to be swallowed by this movement. I decided to leave this bank as a way of making a statement of my beliefs as a Christian,” he said.

    It’s real mind control. We are not to think anything except what is “allowed” about homosexuality. I think it’s beyond sinister.

    July 9, 2016 at 12:12 am
  • Athanasius

    The evil is now publicly manifest, the servants of Lucifer holding the top positions in the world and openly setting their sights on the destruction of the family and all Christian morality. Only a matter of time now until the Almighty takes matters into His own hands and punishes this world most severely for its filth.

    Nor will the present Church hierarchy, from the Pope down, escape the divine wrath for their compliance with, or silence in the face of, such a demonic assault on souls. Matters are rapidly reaching their conclusion. The degeneration is complete and applauded. Soon will come the divine response, I am utterly convinced of it.

    July 9, 2016 at 12:21 am
  • John Kearney

    Yes, we can pray and hope. But you are speaking as Catholics who follow the teachings of Christ but who else in the Catholic Church is doing so. In the pursuit for a Church for our times bishops and priests in Britain have long ago abandoned Christian Marriage and are ‘reaching out to LGBT people for an ‘inclusive’ Church where everyone is happy and they are ‘jolly good fellows. They will put on great shows about caring for the poor, etc, but the victims of their lack of values they simply ignore, the children who suffer from broken families and are destined to follow the same path because the Church does not care. The Apostles were sent to build God’s Kingdom on Earth but they do not even know what that means.

    July 9, 2016 at 11:01 am
  • Athanasius

    John Kearney

    What you correctly describe is a Church whose pastors have lost all sense of the supernatural. It’s the comfort of the body, not the salvation of the soul that now drives these men. God have mercy on them!

    July 9, 2016 at 1:28 pm

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: