“Gays” In UK Government Forcing Their Agenda on Children As Young as Four

“Gays” In UK Government Forcing Their Agenda on Children As Young as Four

From Sky News…

An investigation in the Times newspaper last year revealed that tens of thousands of schoolchildren had been caught sharing sexual imagery.

Children as young as 12 had sent topless pictures to their peers, while one in 10 pupils had “sexted” a “non-school adult”, Freedom of Information data from 50 schools revealed.  Read more

It is against this background, that the Government, led by Education Secretary, Justine Greening, the first openly “gay” woman in the Conservative cabinet,  has announced its intention to introduce four year old children to “relationships” education. And we all know what that means, if you wish to avoid being labelled “homophobic”.   


Now, if the Education Secretary were a traditional Catholic, introducing compulsory teaching about traditional marriage and virtues such as chastity and purity, whether for four year olds or fourteen year olds, there would be an outcry (no pun intended) and the cry would be to the effect that religious beliefs should not drive Government policy and teachers should not be forced to be prescriptive and so on and so forth.  The sheer hypocrisy of it all is breathtaking.

Key question: should “gays” be permitted to continue to enforce their ideology in school classrooms north and south of the border – because, while this latest announcement refers to England, take it as read that the same ideology will soon come to Scotland, that, if it is not already here, it soon will be –  it’ll be the norm, north and south of the border, before you’ve had time to say “Justine Greening’s out!” 

So far, not a single Bishop has called time on this state sanctioned child sex abuse, nor called attention to the hypocrisy of decrying religious beliefs and the natural moral law as a basis for teaching right behaviour and attitudes, whilst permitting the LGBT etc  lobby to run the show, despite the fact that, in the latest release from the Office of National Statistics, only a tiny minority of the population identify as LGBT etc: In 2015, the majority (93.7%) of the UK population identified themselves as heterosexual or straight, with 1.7% identifying as LGB, the remainder either identifying as “other”, “don’t know” or refusing to respond. Young adults (16 to 24 year olds) are more likely to identify as LGB compared with older age groups, and a higher proportion of males identify as LGB than females.”

Clearly, it should come as no surprise that the LGBT goal is to “get them young” – and it is shocking that churchmen are keeping silent at this time, when even small toddlers as young as four are being targeted for the purpose of brainwashing them with LGBT etc propaganda. They’ll be taught that it is OK to have two daddies, two mummies, or decide to be “trans” – there won’t be any warnings at all about the dangers inherent in the whole LGBT etc experiment.   Click here for some facts about the homosexual etc “lifestyle”

What, if anything, can be done about the undue influence exercised by the LGBT etc minority, in classrooms UK-wide?  Is there a Catholic teacher or priest anywhere in the land who is refusing to go along with this scandal?

Comments invited…

Comments (25)

  • Benedict Carter

    The glorification of homosexuality is perhaps the definition of the depths of depravity to which the western world (Christendom!) has fallen.

    Of course, if one does not believe in God then the ‘equality’ ideology has a quasi-rational appeal: but even the pagans never took it to the extremes we do today.

    I personally am sure that the sexualisation of even the air we breathe and the soil we stand on, and the obsession to define one’s very being in sexual terms is concrete proof that the devil and his demons hold almost total sway over the modern world.

    This ia the true sense in which we (and many others even in the mainstream Church) are a remnant.

    March 2, 2017 at 8:23 pm
    • Faith of Our Fathers

      Couldn’t agree more with you . Also now we have the so called Gender Issues. It’s not now is it Man is it a Burd is it a Plane no it’s Supergender . Just googled gender there to see if it’s went up since last week,and yes it has . Bottom of The League is one site with 31 Genders . Near the top is one site with 63 Genders . But top of The League this week is one site with 71 Genders. Man The Alphabet has now been well and truly defeated. By the way I never went into said sites am certainly not brainy enough for that . 2 Genders is good enough for me .

      March 2, 2017 at 8:52 pm
      • editor


        ” It’s not now is it Man is it a Burd is it a Plane no it’s Supergender.

        Hilarious! Love it!

        March 2, 2017 at 10:00 pm
    • editor

      True Benedict. Sadly, all too true. The world is steeped in depravity. No wonder God sent His Mother to prepare for this, even as far back as the 17th century at Quito, seeking a victim soul to suffer for our times. No wonder.

      March 2, 2017 at 10:01 pm
  • Faith of Our Fathers

    ED – We all know about The Homosexual Alphabet agenda I really wish you would stop going on about it and stop this Homophobic Rannting maybe you should watch Constipation Street where am sure you’ll see 2 Dads or 2 Mums happily married with children. Now of course everything I said is a LIE but not according to our society and of course to our very Pro – Homosexual Scottish Parliament where all the closets are definitely empty.

    Question: when we were young were there such words as Homophobic and Islamaphobic for I certainly can’t mind when they were foisted upon us. You now daren’t even use the slang word for a Homosexual or they’re wanting you charged with an offence. Out of all the terrible diseases etc caused by Homosexuality there is one thing the Government NEVER tells us and that is the cost. For Cancer Treatment they moan about the cost, but never do you hear how much treating Homosexuals costs. I think I said this on here before but it’s worth repeating.

    There was a Program called Unsafe Sex and The City which told of various cases. One man had the lot. He had. AIDS Hepatitis. Syphills Gonorrhoea you name it he had it. It went through his health regime and it must have cost a fortune to keep this Guy on his feet. He was asked about his Sex Life and said that in the previous week he had been to 50 Sex Parties.

    Now maybe am just jealous as I’ve never been to even one. But come on he wasn’t even chastised about his lifestyle. Now had that been any other illness as, God forbid. Anxiety and Depression of which the Government wants to stop sickness benefits, he would have been drawn before the Claims Courts and had his benefits stopped. But no it’s Sexual Diseases they carry or seem to carry a Government badge of honour and our Government want children to be mixed up in the middle of these so called Marriages and Relationships. O by the way just as an afterthought I haven’t a clue what goes on in any of the so called Soaps.

    God Bless.

    March 2, 2017 at 8:30 pm
  • Athanasius

    Sex and relationships education for 4-year olds is just the pervert way of robbing children of their innocence. If they really cared about the wellbeing and safety of children the would make Christian moral teaching mandatory and they would shut down Internet and mobile phone resources to immature youth.

    God have mercy on every one who scandalises a child by robbing them of their purity. And that includes the purity of their young minds and hearts, which pervert politicians are doing under the pretext of education. They are knowingly and deliberately sexualising kids!

    March 2, 2017 at 11:59 pm
    • WurdeSmythe

      Children are being used as pawns by self-styled social progressives to prove that they are just as good as non-progressives in caring for children.

      The proper activities of legislatures must proceed from the establishment of proper principles grounded in the recognition of objective reality and a correct understanding of human nature. Absent these, and you have little but current mood or fancy to drive decision-making. Even precedent becomes only another convention that nobody is obliged to recognize.

      Universals exist; thus, not everything is relative. Ideas correspond to reality — i.e. they are not all just artificial constructs of the intellect — and a thing exists in the mind as a universal. Natures exist, and while they are encountered only in concrete individuals, the mind can learn to recognize the universals that form them — that is why we can recognize the color yellow every place it appears, whether it is as a yellow article of clothing or a yellow street sign. Human nature is a reality, which is encountered in individual human beings, and we can learn to recognize the characteristics of this nature: e.g. among other qualities, it possess a vegetative aspect of growth, an animal aspect of movement, and a spiritual aspect of a rational intellect that is nurtured by truth, beauty, and goodness.

      Humans are adaptable, but if you treat a human as something inhuman you destroy the person. You do violence against a person’s human nature when you try to do things like raise him in a home with false substitutes like same-sex care-givers instead of mother and a father, or provide to young personalities inappropriate details about the means of reproduction.

      Children need a mother and father who show both the maternal and paternal aspects of the Divine Love; in this way a child is naturally fitted to grow in knowledge and love of his Creator. Further, the parents – and not anonymous bureaucrats who will never even meet the children – are best suited to know when to discuss sensitive and profound topics to young minds and hearts.

      This is not a matter of private opinion; rather, this is a matter of considering the objective spiritual aspect of human nature. Further, individuals who oppose or refuse this are at war with reality itself; no right-thinking person should sit by silently when this unreality is forced on them. Or on innocent children.

      March 3, 2017 at 1:22 pm
      • Athanasius


        I hear what you’re saying but I don’t believe it’s that complicated. The Commandments of God are written in every heart, so these liberals cannot excuse the sexualising of children under the pretext of educating and protecting them. However misguided they may be in other areas, they cannot escape the moral voice of conscience. What they are really doing, and quite deliberately so, is knowingly implementing full State indoctrination of the next generation in the “Gay Culture”.

        That’s what despotic regimes do, they prioritise indoctrination of young minds and hearts for the “cause”. Stalin did it and Hitler did it. But, evil as they were, even these two infamous characters were not as morally corrupt as the Western Liberals of our day. There’s more than just ideology at work here.We’re looking at a manifestation of the demonic.

        March 3, 2017 at 5:03 pm
  • Josephine

    It’s totally disgraceful that this small group of people are pushing their agenda right through every institution in the UK. It’s also disgraceful that the Church in the UK is complicit in this institutionalised child sex abuse.

    What I can’t understand is why parents are allowing it.

    March 3, 2017 at 11:58 am
    • Margaret Mary


      Don’t forget that if parents complain about this, their child is likely to be marked at risk. That’s one of the issues about the Named Person Scheme which is coming into force. It’s disgraceful, but anyone who dares to question this “lifestyle” is regarded as a pariah.

      March 4, 2017 at 10:59 am
  • Faith of Our Fathers

    Josephine unfortunately Parents allow because of what they now see and hear on The Media. I was over in my Daughters House 6 . 30 pm roughly and 2 Homosexuals kissing full on some garbage T V program. I said to her to turn it off and her answer was ” Their only Gay Dad their not doing any harm “. Lots of young Women now have Homosexuals as their friends usually men am told especially on the Glasgow scene. This I was told from a friend who said his Daughters usually go to a Homosexual Bar mostly men . To us it’s all wrong but that’s the way the young seem to see it Their not doing any harm. Not Just.

    March 3, 2017 at 9:29 pm
    • Margaret Mary

      Faith of our Fathers,

      You are spot on there. Everyone just goes along to get along. If you say differently, people, including other Catholics, just smile. They’ve all been duped or just gone for the easy life.

      About the increasing number of homosexual politicians – what can we do about that? If the PM picks them for important government posts like education, we can’t do a thing.

      It’s very depressing to be in the minority opinion when those who are creating the “opinion” are the real minority, 1.7% of the population! It’s truly beyond the pale.

      March 4, 2017 at 10:57 am
  • Laura

    “If you want to know who controls you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize.” (Voltaire)

    That especially applies to the LGBTI community – we are definitely not allowed to criticise them, and they obviously control the country.

    Shame on the Government for putting small children at risk from this poison.

    March 4, 2017 at 6:02 pm
  • wendy walker

    yes Laura it IS deadly poison …I am truly scared for my Grand and great grand children ..it is just “””legal “”paedophilia thrust down little toddlers throats ……..Their innocence torn away in a Classroom and Parents cannot stop it ..absolutely vile in fact you could not make it up…Forget painting and sand play and stories we have got Porn this afternoon ..I could weep for them and their gagged parents

    March 5, 2017 at 3:24 pm
  • Laura

    I agree with you Wendy, and I wonder how long it will be before paedophilia is legalised. I don’t think it can be that far off.

    March 5, 2017 at 4:01 pm
  • gabriel syme

    This article claims Glasgow City Council is to start building primary schools with unisex toilets:


    To be honest, it sounds like a cynical cost saving measure, dressed up as a sop to the Golden Calf of the “LGBT-XYZ community” to try to avoid criticism.

    A council rep is quoted as saying this “helps the LGBT agenda” because it stops ‘confused’ pupils worrying about whether to go to the girls or the boys toilets.

    If someone is confused about which toilet to use, I think they should be going to the psychiatrist, never mind the toilets.

    The council rep also claims shared toilets “prevent bullying and graffiti” – hmmm sounds like groundless waffle to me, of the type in which the public sector excels.

    The only schools quoted are non-denom schools, it will be interesting to see whether the SCES will accept this in Catholic schools. I am sure we can all expect the usual robust defence of common sense from the SCES – ha ha ha!

    Interestingly, it doesn’t say whether school staff will have unisex toilets. I do hope there will not be double standards and anti-pupil discrimination here? 😛

    Hilariously, the article goes on to refer to “both genders” sharing toilets. Wait a minute? Isn’t that bigoted, to claim there’s only two genders?

    Funny that a bit of normality accidentally slipped into the article, which has the effect of rubbishing the whole piece. It shows what a load of baloney the whole LGBT-XYZ thing is, that a hack writer cant even keep the make-believe story straight for one short article.

    March 6, 2017 at 2:50 pm
  • wendy walker


    March 7, 2017 at 10:34 am
  • wendy walker


    March 13, 2017 at 12:06 pm
  • wendy walker


    Utterly abhorrent……..and shocking

    March 14, 2017 at 9:57 am
    • editor


      that paining featuring the archbishop is utterly and unbelievably shocking. If that isn’t a resigning issue, I’d like to know what it takes.

      March 14, 2017 at 10:39 am
  • wendy walker

    Yes Patricia there are some other very worrying articles on that site as well about …the pope …..!!!!!.

    March 14, 2017 at 11:42 am
  • wendy walker


    March 17, 2017 at 11:15 am
  • wendy walker

    View this email in your browser

    Dear Supporter,

    (Please note the following contains details of a graphic nature)

    I am writing with an urgent request for your help.

    The Government has tabled amendments in the Digital Economy bill (currently going through the Lords) that will severely reduce the scope to block online certain forms of violent pornography. Currently the bill provides for the blocking of ‘prohibited material’, but now the government are proposing to narrow the standard to ‘extreme pornography.’ The amendments will mean there is space, not only for simulated child sex abuse images, but also for all but the most violent forms of pornography (specifically that which is life threatening and likely to result in serious injury to breasts, anus and genitals or to involve non-consensual penetration) so long as it is placed behind age-verification checks.

    This watering-down is obviously of great concern, and, significantly, introduces a much weaker standard in the online world than exists in the offline world.

    These amendments are due to be voted on this coming Monday afternoon (20th) so we need to act fast. We are working alongside CARE to generate as much opposition as possible. Could you find a few minutes over the weekend to email a Peer to express your concern and ask them to oppose them?

    I have written some guidelines below on how to go about this, and the key points to make.

    Thank you for your time – your support is much appreciated.

    Best wishes,

    Emailing a Peer
    Go to the website http://www.writetothem.com, enter your postcode and select ‘Write to a Lord’
    Scroll down and click on the green button ‘Get a random Lord’
    Enter your message in the box provided and complete your details before pressing send
    Key points

    It’s far more persuasive to write to a Peer using your own words than copying and pasting a standard template, but here are some key points you may wish to include:
    ask them to oppose Government amendments 25H, 25W and 25YC which remove Prohibited Material from the Digital Economy Bill and put Extreme Pornography in its place
    Extreme Pornography is a far narrower standard than Prohibited Material. The act of replacing Prohibited Material with Extreme Pornography constitutes a deliberate act to make space for:
    a) violent pornography so long as it is not life threatening and does not result in severe injury to the breasts, anus or genitals and
    b) any pornographic image, including pornographic images of children, that a person would not consider real (e.g. animated images, drawings)
    The idea that Prohibited Material is not a good legal definition does not stand up to scrutiny since it was inserted in the Communications Act as recently as 2014 and the Government saw fit to put it in the Digital Economy Bill and to defend it vigorously at Second Reading. It constitutes the current offline standard and has been developed over many years.
    There is a danger that this will jeopardise the offline standard as people question why the law allows them to access certain materials online but not offline
    Amendments go against the Government’s stance on violence against women
    Should the amendments go through, ask them to vote in favour of Baroness Butler-Sloss’s amendment 25YD which will at least call for the government’s proposals to be reviewed after two years and also provides an option for the current standards in the Bill to be restored after three years

    Copyright © 2017 Mediawatch-UK, All rights reserved.
    You are receiving this email as a member of Mediawatch-UK.

    Our mailing address is:
    3 Willow House
    Kennington Road
    Ashford, Kent TN24 0NR
    United Kingdom

    Add us to your address book

    Want to change how you receive these emails?
    You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

    Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

    March 18, 2017 at 6:39 pm
  • wendy walker

    Wasnt quite sure where this one belongs …its Pornography please share widely to stop this appalling abuse

    March 18, 2017 at 6:41 pm
  • wendy walker


    March 24, 2017 at 9:59 am

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: