Trump Impeachment: “Star” Witness’s Fake Evidence Hilariously Exposededitor
Having caught the headline delivered with sombre affectation by the Sky News USA correspondent, Amanda Walker, prior to the televised hearings, and smelling the usual stitch-up, I decided to switch to the Parliament Channel and watch the proceedings live. I’m glad I did because what I saw (including the above hilarious clip) bore no resemblance to the later Sky News reports which I made a point of watching for comparison purposes. Apparently unaware of the the irony of her words, Amanda Walker took the camera to a particular woman in the queue waiting to go into the hearings, because this woman wanted to hear the evidence against the President for herself, “she doesn’t trust the media” confided Amanda to those of us, feet up in our living rooms, saying “neither do I!” Below, the headline just taken from the Sky News website…
Impeachment inquiry: Donald Trump ‘overheard asking about investigations’ Top US diplomats are giving evidence to a televised impeachment inquiry which could see the president removed from office.
Now watch the hilarious clip from this afternoon’s hearings and ask yourself if Donald Trump is even close to being removed from office.
For the purpose of this discussion, though [and I’m assuming that bloggers will have read John Ingram’s Open Letter to Anti-Trump Catholics in America, published on page 6 of our current, November, newsletter], the question has to centre on this: whether Catholics have any option but to vote Trump into a second term – given his excellent pro-life record and the fact that he is hated beyond words for it, by his political opponents who, it seems, will go to any and all lengths, even blatantly lying, to get rid of him.
If ever an impeachment inquiry was – manifestly – contrived, this has to be it… Or maybe you disagree?
I refused to pay any attention to these farcical “impeachment” hearings because I decided, some time ago, that there are two real reasons for this circus, neither of which is to impeach President Trump:
1. To create an ongoing distraction and diversion from the real criminal activity, which will soon be disclosed, which involves Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Brennan, McCabe, and all the rest of the corrupt leftists and their bureaucrat flunkies: i.e. that Obama illegally ordered espionage on the Trump campaign, and Hillary Clinton paid for it with Democratic National Committee funds – i.e. campaign funds – to create a phony “dossier.”
2. This reason is even more devious (my conspiracy theory within a conspiracy theory, if you will): the Democrats don’t actually intend to impeach the President. They, with their strings being pulled by the Communist globalists, intend to create the appearance of an impeachment, with endless fake evidence like this pathetic, bumbling “star witness,” because this serves a much better purpose: to tear the county apart into warring camps and to facilitate a descent into anarchy, which is always the goal of leftists.
But there are two other reasons why President Trump won’t be impeached: one, Mike Pence would become President, a man who is a true conservative, and who would continue to loosen the grip of the socialist octopus that has been strangling America (along with Europe and most of the globe).
Two, there would be rioting in the streets, because Donald Trump is so extremely popular. Only leftists, you see, are allowed to riot (and call it righteous protesting).
So what better way to bring America to the brink of civil war than by a 24/7 smear campaign featuring fake charges spread by corrupt Democrats and their allies in the media?
Reason #2, by the way, is also the reason I think Trump will be re-elected, although it will be messy. He provides a useful target for the many and well-paid subversives who are busily wreaking havoc in the fabric of American life.
Your post is really interesting. I’ve been watching Sky News this morning and they are showing exactly the same report from yesterday about the impreachment, with a ridiculous interpretation to put the “star witness” and his side-kick George Kent in the best possible light.
The hapless Amanda Walker says so solemnly to camera that the reason why the Chairman has begun by reading the impressive military etc background of the “star witness”‘ is to underline his credibility. Hilarious when you watch the above clip – his credibility was in shreds after Jordan’s five minutes of questioning but they edited out everything after Jordan said “and you are their star witness”. His hilarious repetition of the “six people having four conversations in one sentence” is omitted.
I do hope we are able to see the Obama/Hillary etc “real criminal activity”, as you put it, exposed sooner rather than later.
It is terrifying to think that, without the internet, relying only on the print and broadcasting media, we would be kept totally in the dark about the truth of this – and other – important matters of government. The career politicians and the media muppets are a bunch of unconscionable goons, and then some…
It is also interesting that, even with the monopolized grip on “news” held by the globalists, they are losing their grip to populists movements in many countries: besides the USA, there is Brazil (btw, did you notice any comments from the Brazilian President on the heretical doings at the Sham-a-Zon? Neither did I), Italy, Hungary, Poland.
Speaking of “news,” shouldn’t Sky News be calling itself “Sky Propaganda”?
There are several very good articles about this farce on the American Thinker website, including the fact that George Kent is a George Soros leg-man, and that Soros has a vested interest in the Ukraine! If any of you UK citizens are interested in digging deeper, do pay the AT site a visit.
Here’s one example:
That’s a fantastic article and the video is just superb. It completely debunks the whole impeachment scam.
Keep your eyes peeled for news about a member of Nancy Pelosi’s family making money out of the Ukraine too. I have heard that this will hit the fan before long. I would love to see that harpy get her comeuppance.
I hadn’t heard about that but thank you for the heads up – I’m looking forward to all the Democrat (DemocRAT) crime families getting their due! From Obama, Clinton, Biden, Pelosi on down, they are rotten to the core, and they would all sell out their own grandmothers if it meant more money and power.
That is dynamite about Obama/Clinton/Comey etc. We just don’t get to hear that sort of allegation over here.
I see people interviewed on the news who are writing books about Trump, always against him. What I’d love to know is, do these people actually know the truth and suppress it, or are they the typical “useful idiots” who just believe what they see reported, without genuinely researching it?
Your statement that Trump is “so extremely popular” is amazing because that is not the impression given over here. They keep saying he is only popular with “his base” but everyone else hates him.
It came to light about 10 days ago that Attorney General William Barr is developing a criminal case against those who perpetrated the “Russia hoax.” That means that it has progressed beyond an “investigation,” and that there will soon be grand juries impaneled.
And as the labyrinthine volumes of evidence have exposed, the corruption goes all the way to the Oval Office under the Muslim Communist Obama.
As for President Trump’s popularity, look around the internet for the size of the crowds that appear at every one of his rallies, no matter where in the country he has them (but don’t use Google as a search tool, Google is filtering out real news, just like the TV and radio media). His “base” just happens to number in the tens of millions.
“the Muslim Communist Obama” – I thought he denied being a Muslim? However, his insistence on saying “happy holidays” at Christmas makes me wonder about that.
Also of note is the fact that Donald Trump, before he moved into the White House, had all the Muslim paraphernalia (e.g. prayer rugs) removed, and then Mrs. Trump had the place exorcised.
Now, what would Muslim prayer rugs be doing in a White House occupied by an alleged Christian? Hmmmm…
Thank you for that American Thinker article – I am just so surprised. It makes me wonder just what else we don’t know about these politicians.
I do recall reading about the White House being exorcised but I had totally forgotten until your comment. As you say, what would Muslim prayer rugs be doing in a White House occupied by an alleged Christian?
What I don’t understand is why he bothered to pretend to be a Christian. We have Muslims serving in our government and one could be PM if voted in, so I presume a Muslim could also be President of the USA?
There are lots of things Obama pretended to be, including a citizen of the USA, and had the so-called press cover his tracks for him.
As for us having a Muslim president, that won’t happen for the foreseeable future – hopefully never – because that “religion” is accurately seen here as a mortal threat to the American way of life. There are a handful of Muslims serving in the House of Representatives at the moment, one of whom married her brother (forbidden under Sharia law), and all of whom are far leftists and anti-Semites.
I use Bing, but another popular one is DuckDuckGo. You can find a list of alternate search engines by typing that phrase into your search box.
Some other names that came up with this search:
Qwant (French company)
Yandex (Russian company)
The video is truly hilarious, right enough. Even the ambassador/witness was laughing!
If ever there was a stitch up, as the intro says, this is it.
I am just amazed that Donald Trump keeps going. I’m afraid I’d have thrown the towel in a long time ago and said “America’s loss”.
It isn’t being reported here but it is important to know that Adam Schiff who is the Democrat chairing this impeachment charade, denies knowing the identify of the whistleblower! The comments under this YouTube video suggest that he is lying about this.
“Liar” might as well be Mr. Schiff’s middle name.
This is all really very interesting – I didn’t know the half of it.
The UK media is definitely heavily censored and very biased. It couldn’t be more obvious that they are out to get Trump at any cost.
So, my answer to the question about Catholics voting for Trump is that definitely, they don’t have any option but to vote for the president, who has saved countless babies’ lives. That alone makes him the Catholic choice. I hope the US bishops are saying the same thing.
I’m still waiting for President Trump to turn off the multi-million dollar “refugee resettlement” spigot to these traitors aka American bishops. Although, since Trump is a master strategist, he’s probably got other ideas up his sleeve.
Media here continue to report the impeachment hearings as exposing President Trump – instead of exposing the dishonest witnesses.
The finger pointing to Obama gets larger:
And this one shows the nonsense of this whole impeachment “inquiry” – see Obama “danced to Putin’s tune” as testified by one of the Democrats’ key witnesses. They’re a hapless lot!
Just read that – it seems that the Democrat strategy is to accuse President Trump of everything that THEY have done!
The Trump impeachment hearings are just beyond incredible. The chairman, Schiff, is about as blatant a liar as any of us are ever likely to encounter in this world. Here’s a short overview, from someone who sees right through the charade…
I wish she had used another descriptor besides “Americans know this is a waste of time,” though maybe that is what will resonate the most with everyday viewers.
I think a better description would be: “Americans know this is treason, and the Democrats are lying scum whose strings are being pulled (i.e. they are being rewarded) by their globalist Communist masters.”
But why? Not because “they hate Donald Trump.” It’s because he represents a dire threat to (a) their dreams of international socialism, i.e. global tyranny, and (b) the privileges that appertain thereto, for the bureaucrats and leg-men who have sold their souls to the money-masters.
The Communist apparatchiks, aka the Democrats and some Republicans, you see, don’t want their paychecks taken away.
It’s just incredible how the media reporting here in the UK is totally divorced from what I’ve seen in the live proceedings. Not one media report has quoted the content of this clip below – which is central to the whole subject matter and flatly proves that the charges against the President are bogus. It’s truly beyond incredible… It’s being reported here as if, but for the unlikelihood of the Senate impeaching the President, he would be gone – guilty without a single shred of evidence. I’m amazed…
Note: Sondland is the US Ambassador to the European Union…
The first thing I noticed about this clown was his smirk, and recalled what an author (I forget his name) who wrote about the Federal Reserve Bank said long ago about the “insider’s smirk.” That is, whenever these elitist leg-men are called to account and have to appear before a camera, they smirk, because they know what’s really going on, they know who’s in control, and they know they’re protected by the rich and powerful (that is, unless they’ve been appointed to be a fall guy for someone higher up).
I don’t really think that applies to Ambassacor Sondland. I interpreted his smirk as insecurity. I don’t actually think he’s the brightest button in the box, to be frank.
Could be insecurity, but I would tend to associate smirking with conceit rather than insecurity.
James Comey had the same smirk – Comey, the former FBI Director who’s spent much of his career covering for Crooked Hillary…the consummate corrupt smirking insider,
I’ll go with your judgment since I don’t really know all the characters involved. When I’ve seen Comey, I always thought he looked tired, with his huge bags under his eyes. Sign of a guilty conscience, or can be.
RCA Victor / Josephine,
Here an interesting reference to smirking!
They’re certainly not laughing now!
Comments are closed.