Masks Are A Ticking Time Bomb …editor
- It’s estimated that 129 billion face masks are used worldwide each month, which works out to about 3 million masks a minute
- Not only are masks not being recycled, but their materials make them likely to persist and accumulate in the environment
- Because masks may be directly made from microsized plastic fibers with a thickness of 1 mm to 10 mm, they may release microsized particles into the environment more readily — and faster — than larger plastic items, like plastic bags
- Microbes from your mouth, known as oral commensals, frequently enter your lungs, where they’ve been linked to advanced stage lung cancer; wearing a mask could potentially accelerate this process
- The “new normal” of widespread masking is affecting not only the environment but also the mental and physical health of humans
Click here to read complete article
The ubiquitous COVID-19 face masks are online, in stores and in pockets. Their use has been required by many government agencies and executive orders, private corporations and even, in confrontations that sometimes have turned violent, passersby on the street.
The “experts” have, at times, said they must be used, or shouldn’t be used. Or maybe three or four should be used.
Advertisement – story continues below
Now a prominent physician is warning of the harm they can cause to individuals and the global community.
Dr. Joseph Mercola, a New York Times bestselling author, wrote in a column published by NOQ Report that they are a “ticking time bomb,” because of the multiple threats they pose.
Which would you prefer… Get fired for not complying with face-mask (unlawful) rule or become very sick, perhaps suffer dementia-type illness in old age? Click here to read more
I do not wear a mask. I do wear a little badge that I have downloaded from the NHS website that says that I am “exempt”. It gives no reason for this. This badge should hopefully keep me out of fist fights, indecorous at my age. If a reason had to be given it might be “bolshie individual”.
Apart from inhaling bits of plastic – when will plastic be completely banned? – the masks do not prevent viruses being spread. The perforations in the mask have to be wide enough to allow the passage of air. Air molecules are much larger than viruses. if you can breath then you are not stopping viruses.
Moreover, when wearing a mask there is an element of re-breathing your own exhaled air. When you breath through a mask your oxygen intake is reduced from what it would otherwise be. Less oxygen may be supplied to the brain and this will cause damage over time. That is the reason why some people with reduced breathing efficiency, such as asthmatics, are exempt from wearing masks. That being so there can be little argument that mask wearing is just bad for everyone.
I don’t wear a mask and I do carry the exemption card in my bag, but I won’t show it unless I have to because I don’t want to be going along with any of this nonsense at all. The more we refuse to co-operate, the better. Nobody should ask why you are not wearing a mask but if they do, you can tell them it’s none of their business and that the government says they are supposed to assume that you are exempt. That usually shuts them up without fisticuffs!
I find that very few people ask now and in my own case, it’s only been the staff member positioned at the entrance to the supermarket. They don’t query when I say “exempt”. The only exception was when I visited the dentist a while back. That was a dreadful experience and I left without any examination or treatment. I then started brushing my teeth a dozen times a day in addition to washing my hands a million times a day 😀
There is more information about the damage caused by masks in one of our former discussion threads – irreversible brain damage for starters… Here’s the link, but it is not saving as the usual link – still you can reach it by clicking below…
I have never donned a mask and I don’t carry any “exempt” badges. However, I do carry a letter from the Scottish Government saying that nobody has the right to question me and nobody ever has. Sod them all, I say, and excuse the language!
That’s a great idea – to carry the letter, I mean (not so much the language but since I don’t know any other sense of it except a clod of God’s green earth, you’re excused… ) 😀
Would you please post the link to the Scottish Government letter which you carry. I tried to find it just now on a very quick search but had no success. Judging by your avatar, you should be young enough to be an IT whizz kid, so your practical support for FOOF would be much appreciated – scroll down to read his comment and my reply referencing you. Phew!
There has been some rebellion in the USA against wearing masks, but there’s no pushback here, that I can see.
I agree – a bit of similar pushback in the UK would be very welcome indeed. More likely to happen in England, though – up here, it’s just been “surrender” all the way.
Braveheart… Yeah right.
I don’t wear a mask – I never will. It’s obvious that it cannot be healthy wearing something across your nose and mouth for hours on end. I’ve got friends who get rashes on the face from wearing one.
Those protesters in the video have a point – if more people refused to wear them, the thing would end. It’s not about the virus, it’s all about control and the government can control us as long as we do what they tell us. Taking off the masks is a good way to start taking back control.
I get particularly angry when I see priests and bishops (plus the pope) wearing one. They should know better.
Well said – I agree with your every word. ESPECIALLY your closing paragraph.
The Mask thing is of course just another way to Control The Peasants ,i personally do wear a Mask as i have been refused Entry on Buses until i put one on. Which the Logic i believe i have already shared on here. As it has been said Most ( as far as i know ) who dont wear Masks on Buses have Exempt Thingys hanging around their necks. As i said about 3 weeks ago their were only 8 of us on the Bus ( it was one where i was refused entry until ad put my Mask on ) Now 4 had Masks on and 4 had not. Now probably the 4 that didnt have Masks on have Breathing or Lung Problems which means that their more liable to Catch this Chinese Disease than the ones with Masks on. The Logic of the Masks was surely brought to light when Dr Fu Man Chu – Fauci said that Wearing 2 Masks was better than 1. On that idiotic Logic it surely means that if i wear 10 Masks then there is no chance of Me catching The Chinese Disease. That of course would make perfect Logic as far as Dr Fauci is concerned as i would then suffocate and my 10 Masks could be freed up for others to wear.
Hilarious! Fauci is such a plonker.
Here is Dr Fauci making a real fool of himself, refusing to say that protests spread the virus even if protesters are wearing a mask, LOL!
“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci.
He keeps contradicting himself .Later on he says they are essential, and even says to wear more than one! He’s one of the elite, who are orchestrating this whole global panic.
Contradicting himself is not the half of it! His Federal agency, thanks to him, actually funded gain-of-function viral research taking place in the Wuhan lab. That research was illegal.
How’s that for insanity? The USA sends money to its worst enemy for “medical” research! More proof that these globalists have no patriotic allegiances or loyalties – they’re all about money, and to h – e- double -sticks with America.
I’ve also read that he holds a patent on one of the vaccines, but don’t have any details about that.
That’s amazing. But what is it with these doctors who are supposed to be experts. They don’t inspire confidence. I don’t trust any of them – not Fauci and none of the experts here in the UK either – including the doctor who appears on the ITV morning show Good Morning Britain. He’s obviously being paid a fortune for his running commentary on the lockdowns and vaccines etc because he is desperate to keep the whole thing going for as long as possible. I wouldn’t trust him to tell me the time of day, never mind trust him on health issues like this virus.
“But what is it with these doctors who are supposed to be experts.”
To paraphrase my late father (eternal memory): They’re so smart they’re stupid.
Here’s Dr Fauci faced with the lack of social distancing at the border. Crackers.
What amazes, me though, is that the same congressmen who are challenging the lockdown and demanding their freedoms back (Jim Jordan in a separate challenge to Fauci) do not question the masks at all. In fact, they are wearing them! Incredible.
Insanity is the word, right enough. I totally believe it’s all about money and Fauci must be raking it in.
The bus driver who refuses entry onto his bus must surely be breaking the law. Nobody needs to actually wear the exemption card round their neck – I keep mine in my purse but I’ve never, not once, had to show it to anyone, and would only do so as a last resort to shut them up.
Why not find and print off the Government letter which states that nobody should be asked about their exemption. I’ll post a response to Helen above, asking her to provide a link if possible, since, on a very quick search, I can’t find it.
I have, however, seen an email from an MSP to a constituent saying exactly that and I’m sure he provided that link. Anyway, I’m off to ask Helen.
Do NOT allow yourself to be bullied about this – none of these idiots will be around to care for you in later life if (God forbid) you suffer ill health of any kind as a result of wearing these ridiculous masks.
Here in north Idaho, USA, we have been blessed over the last year or so with a relatively normal life. Churches had been closed in March of last year for a few weeks; but they opened a year ago — initially with limited seating, but very soon thereafter with nearly full capacity and practically no one wearing masks in the church. The only places we wear masks are the COSTCO, which as a “membership” club, sets it own rules, and the USAF base in Washington state, where I work. (The military is on a mission of self-implosion, more concerned about LGBT “inclusivity,” weeding out “extremists” — i.e., MAGA hat wearers — and avoiding the dreaded virus, than preparing for the possibility of war. “Si vis pacem, para bellum” is no longer the watchword.) Masks were “mandated” for several months last year by the local Health District, but as the members of that board are nearly all political appointees instead of elected officials, the “non-compliance” was overwhelming to mask proponents. Meanwhile, God bless our police, who let it be known publicly that they would not be enforcing the Health District “mandate,” nor responding to calls from either store owners or shoppers reporting those who refused the mask.
Firstly, my apologies because your comment – inexplicably – went into one of the admin files where I found it a couple of minutes ago on a routine search. The Wonders of WordPress strike every now and again.
You are very blessed to be living in a place where life is relatively normal. We are constantly under the threat of being returned to strict lockdown. Our churches are re-opened (thanks to the legal challenge brought by a group of Protestant ministers) but the bishops/priests are still imposing restrictions such as reduced numbers. Shameful.
Other “non-essential” services will be re-opening this month at some point (I don’t keep up with it all, but I was told this morning that the 26 April is when more places will be opening). We’re now routinely speaking about what we will be “allowed” to do, so the tyranny will continue indefinitely. Not only do we NOT have police like the sensible ones you describe, who refuse to enforce the mask-rule, we are being told that masks are here to stay. Oh, they don’t say it like that – they throw out little hints like, we’ll “probably” need to wear them until 2022, or 2023… they’re here to stay. That’s the truth of it.
I was speaking to someone after Mass today who is hopeful that we will now, soon be coming out of the lockdown for good. I am already trying to work out what rationale they will use to get the stay-at-home policy back into full swing. Possibly, the claim will be that the vaccine isn’t quite as successful as previously thought (now that over half the population has been vaccinated) and so better to be safe than sorry… blah, blah. That’s one possibility, but there are plenty more where that came from…
In the meantime, we pray for a good pope who will consecrate Russia, and learn to live with the memory of what it was like to live in a (reasonably) free country. That and reflect on what the future holds, especially for the young and those trying to find useful employment in the “new normal”…
Dear Madame Editor:
“In the meantime, we pray for a good pope who will consecrate Russia… “.
Pope Pius XII *did* consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in the early 1950s BUT WITHOUT ALL the bishops! +Sister Lucia said that this was “incomplete” according to what Our Lord told her. ALL the bishops MUST join the Holy Father in making the Collegial Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on the same day and at the same hour. So if Pope Francis does it 🙏 at 12 noon in the Vatican, Archbishops Gudziak and Perez must do it at 7 a.m. EDT in Philadelphia. (I don’t know what Glasgow time is in relation to the Vatican.)
On June 13, 1929 (N.B.), in the Presence of the Most Holy Trinity, Our Lady said:
“The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father to order and make in union with all the bishops of the world the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means. There are so many souls whom the Justice of God condemns for sins committed against me that I have come to ask for reparation: sacrifice yourself for this intention and pray.”
Yours in Christ our Risen King,
There have been several attempts to consecrate Russia by various popes but none of them have contained all the elements. I kind of take it for granted at this stage that readers will know that. When I call for the consecration I take it for granted that everyone will understand that I mean “as requested by Our Lady”.
So, thank you for that reminder, for those who may have misunderstood my meaning.
I read somewhere not long ago that this latest round of PC insanity actually started with Chris Miller as Acting Secretary of DoD, in December 2020, I think. I found that hard to believe, since C.M. was supposed to be one of the biggest “white hats,” but wondered if perhaps it was a ruse, since his specialty was supposedly psywar.
Do you have any information about that?
Good morning, RCAVictor,
I do not know if it was Chris Miller behind this latest round of silliness. I think the timing could be right, as it was also some time in December, as I recall, that Dr. (I use that title loosely) Fauci began the “two-mask” propaganda. As is typical of that man, he waffled on the issue for days, one day mentioning that there was not enough medical evidence to support his contention, then the next day saying something ridiculous like: “Well, if one mask works well, it only stands to reason that two masks would be twice as effective.” I wished so many times over the last year that the Donald would have sent this charlatan packing. And speaking of timing, isn’t it interesting to note that within 24 hours of Creepy Joe usurping the Presidency on 20 January, the CDC revised its definition of a “case” to be a “positive” Polymerase Chain Reaction test PLUS at least two of the “recognized symptoms” of infection by the dread virus?
The mask wearing fanaticism is one of the worst features of this whole scam. This article is very interesting although he takes a while to get to the masks. It’s packed with information. I copied just one short paragraph near the end where he goes into detail about masks/face-coverings:
I understand the psychological crutch that people feel with something covering their mouth/nose. I am sorry, but that is a false sense of security. Perception is NOT reality, just like the neutrino. The mind says that you have some solid thing covering your mouth and nose but that is not really the case, it is porous; things get through (or go around)..
I’ve felt all along that that is all it is – a psychological crutch. I wish people would chuck them and say “enough is enough”. I doubt if many will do that, though – what is becoming clear through all of this is that most people are followers not leaders.
Julia Hartley-Brewer challenges minister on facemasks in schools: ‘Do you just not care?’
Here’s a REAL lockdown sceptic – a pub landlord who threw Sir Keir Starmer out of his pub, for not doing his job as Labour leader by opposing Boris – three cheers for this landlord.
Comments are closed.